Disclaimer: GambleDB is not affiliated with the UK Gambling Commission.

🎲 DK Crown Holdings Inc

Account Number: 42475

Active

DK Crown Holdings Inc operates 3 online gambling sites in the UK. Their gambling sites include www.draftkings.uk, www.draftkings.com, www.draftkings.co.uk. DK Crown Holdings Inc has 1 regulatory action on record with the UK Gambling Commission.

🎲 DK Crown Holdings Inc Sister Sites

draftkings.uk
draftkings.com
draftkings.co.uk

🏢 Business Information

DK Crown Holdings Inc

42475

Active

📍 Address Information

222 Berkeley Street, Boston

02116

USA

📋 Licence Types

License #042475-R-321959-007
Active
Remote License
Gambling Software Provider
Online Pool Betting

⚠️ Regulatory Actions

Sanction Financial penalty
Decision Date: 12th September 2024

What This Means:

DK Crown Holdings Inc was fined £28,750 for failing to properly manage self-exclusion measures, which are designed to help players avoid gambling when they need to. The company reported the issue themselves and took quick action to fix it, so this incident shouldn't affect your ability to play with them. Players can continue to monitor their accounts as usual.

View Official Details

Following an investigation into a key event submission by DK Crown Holdings Inc (“the Licensee”), the Gambling Commission (“the Commission”) found that the Licensee breached: Social Responsibility Code Provision (“SRCP”) 3.5.3(1) – Self-exclusion The failure to comply with a SRCP is a breach of a licence condition by virtue of section 82(1) of the Gambling Act 2005 (“the Act”). In line with the Commission’s Licensing, compliance and enforcement policy statement and the Statement of principles for determining financial penalties, the Commission has decided to impose a financial penalty of £28,750 under section 121(1) of the Act. Commission Officials note that the Licensee identified the breach and proactively reported it to the Commission. The Licensee took immediate remedial action to address the identified issues and co-operated with the Commission throughout the investigation. The Commission also notes that the SRCP breach relates to a specific exceptional issue and that the Licensee’s self-exclusion procedures, in general, continued to operate.