Disclaimer: GambleDB is not affiliated with the UK Gambling Commission. Data sourced from official UKGC public register.
🎲 Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett
Account Number: 2589
Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett is a UKGC-licensed gambling operator. The company trades under names including crown bingo, crown bingo and social club, peter arnett leisure and 1 more. Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett has 1 regulatory action on record with the UK Gambling Commission.
Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett is a Great Britain gambling operator licensed by the UK Gambling Commission and recorded as active.
Company information
The operator is recorded by the Gambling Commission as a partnership between named individuals Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett.
Licensing and operations
The operator holds a Gambling Commission operating licence.
Regulatory history
The Gambling Commission public register records the licence status as active. No regulatory sanctions, suspensions, or revocations are recorded against this licence on the public register.
🏢 Business Information
Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett
2589
📍 Address Information
Crown Buildings, 15 High Street, Cosham, PORTSMOUTH
PO6 3BU
United Kingdom
📋 Licence Types
⚠️ Regulatory Actions
What This Means:
Peter and Nicholas Arnett, who run the 'Pot of Gold' Adult Gaming Centre, were found to have not followed important social responsibility rules. As a result, they have been fined £13,000. Players can rest assured that this action won't affect their ability to play at the venue.
View Official Details
Following a review of the operating licence undertaken against Peter Arnett and Nicholas Arnett (“the Licensee”) the Commission found that the Licensee: Failed to comply with Social Responsibility Code Provision (“SRCP”) 3.5.6 – multi-operator non-remote SR Code in respect of its Adult Gaming Centre ‘Pot of Gold’. In line with the Commission’s Licensing, compliance and enforcement policy statement, and the Statement of principles for determining financial penalties, the Commission has decided to impose a financial penalty under section 121 of the Act. Given the circumstances of the investigation, Officials considered a financial penalty of £13,000 was an appropriate reflection to the seriousness of the failings. The Licensee co-operated with the Commission throughout the investigation and took corrective steps to address the identified failings.
